BurbageLaw

Developments

Congress carries United States Patent and Trademark Office fee setting authority only to the end of the year

2026-09-02Costs

Hearing, “Renewal of USPTO Fee Setting Authority: Giving Full Effect to the America Invents Act,” Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence, and the Internet, Committee on the Judiciary, United States House of Representatives, September 2, 2026

The authority Congress granted the United States Patent and Trademark Office to set and adjust its own fees under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act was scheduled to lapse on September 16, 2026, at the end of the fifteen-year period running from enactment. Section 2015 of Division B of Senate Resolution 830 amended Section 10(i)(2) of that Act to carry the authority to December 11, 2026 instead. The Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence, and the Internet held an oversight hearing on renewal on September 2, 2026, taking testimony from Teresa Rea of Rea Consulting, Morgan Reed of the Association for Competitive Technology, Professor Melissa Wasserman of the University of Texas School of Law, and David Kappos of the Council for Innovation Promotion. The witnesses supported renewal but divided on whether Congress should attach conditions, among them a genuine sunset, limits on the Office's discretionary denial of inter partes review institution, and full reconstitution of the Patent Public Advisory Committee, which is operating with four of its nine voting members. Professor Wasserman urged that the Office recover more of its examination cost before allowance while keeping the small entity and micro entity discounts in place.

What it changesA patent budget built more than a year out should not assume the current fee schedule. The restructuring discussed at the hearing moves money forward, toward filing and examination and away from issuance and maintenance, which raises the cash requirement in the first eighteen months of every new matter. The program most exposed is the one with a large pending docket and a small issued base, which describes most companies filing heavily on artificial intelligence right now. Model the front-loaded case against the current docket before the December deadline, not after a notice of proposed rulemaking appears.

← All recent developments  ·  Full archive

This is general information about a published decision, agency guidance or piece of legislation. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Items concerning offices outside the United States are reported for information only and are not counsel on the law of those countries.