BurbageLaw

Developments

China treats a machine learning algorithm tied to hardware performance or to natural-law data as technical

2024-01-20CNIPA

Patent Examination Guidelines (2023), China National Intellectual Property Administration Order No. 78, issued 21 December 2023, effective 20 January 2024, Part II, Chapter 9, Section 6

The China National Intellectual Property Administration revised the chapter of its Patent Examination Guidelines on inventions involving computer programs to give clearer rules for big data and artificial intelligence. Under the revised subject-matter test, a solution that improves an artificial intelligence or big data algorithm, such as deep learning or clustering, is a technical solution under Article 2(2) of the Patent Law where the algorithm has a specific technical association with the internal structure of the computer system and solves the technical problem of improving hardware computing efficiency or execution effect, for example by reducing data storage or transmission or increasing processing speed. Big data processing in a specific application field also qualifies where classification, clustering, regression analysis or neural networks are used to mine internal relationships in the data that conform to natural laws. At inventive step, the contribution of an algorithm feature that functionally supports and interacts with the technical features must be considered, and an improvement in user experience counts only if it is produced by the technical features, alone or together with such interacting algorithm features. New examples address training a deep neural network, coupon usage propensity, knowledge-graph reasoning and adapting neural network parameters, and hold a financial product price prediction method not to be a technical solution.

What it changesThe revision gives Chinese filings two routes for a machine learning claim and closes a third. A model improvement is technical when the claim ties the algorithm to how the computer stores, moves or processes data and states the efficiency effect. A data-analysis model is technical when it operates on data from a specific technical field and the specification explains the natural-law relationship it extracts. A model that predicts financial prices is not, because the relationship it learns is not governed by natural law. For applications that will enter China, the hardware effect or the physical meaning of the inputs and outputs has to be in the specification as first filed, not supplied at national phase, because Article 33 of the Patent Law will not allow either to be added after filing. Inventive step arguments should rest on the interaction between the algorithm and the technical features, since an algorithm or a user-experience gain argued alone carries no weight.

More on Eligibility of software and AI claims

← All recent developments  ·  Search all developments

Burbage Law is the practice of Jon Burbage, a registered patent attorney. 342 United States patents have issued from applications he wrote; the full list is on the Patents page. More about Jon Burbage.

This is general information about a published decision, agency guidance or piece of legislation. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Items concerning offices outside the United States are reported for information only and are not counsel on the law of those countries.